Explaining Political Disagreement(ISBN=9780521053990) 夸克云 txt pdf umd tct 百度云 kindle 下载

This book considers a variety of explanations of why political

disagreement is so extensive and persistent. The author examines

variants of the 'contestability' and 'imperfection' conceptions

which have dominated political theory: the idea that political

disagreement is so pervasive because of its value-ladenness; that

key political concepts are essentially contested; that those who

occupy very different political positions fail to understand each

other. He argues that we need to develop a framework which borrows

elements from both schools of thought, presupposing some form of

moral cognitivism, while recognizing that many political disputes

cannot be resolved to the satisfaction of every reasonable person.

Within such a framework he shows how empirical models can be

constructed which give an active role not only to the agent's

reasons for his or her beliefs, but also to other psychological and

sociological considerations.

Preface

Acknowledgements

Introduction

1. Differences in values

2. The notion of an essentially contested concept

3. The miscommunication thesis

4. Integrating rational and non-rational explanations

5. A model for explaining some moral and political

differences

Concluding remarks

Appendix

Bibliography

Index

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Explaining Political Disagreement(ISBN=9780521053990)在线阅读

在线听书地址：Explaining Political Disagreement(ISBN=9780521053990)在线收听

在线购买地址：Explaining Political Disagreement(ISBN=9780521053990)在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

Examines explanations of why people disagree so vehemently and

persistently about political issues ? Author builds an original

theory drawing elements from traditional theories, and the ideas of

psychologists and feminist writers ? May have a market among

students of gender studies as well as political theory and

political philosophy

书籍介绍

This book examines a number of different accounts developed by philosophers and political theorists to explain why political disagreement is so extensive and persistent. The author argues that moral and political questions can have correct answers, but that not every reasonable person will necessarily be satisfied with these answers. He develops a framework that gives a role to the individual's reasons for his or her beliefs, but also to psychological and sociological factors, to explain the intractability of political disputes.